Ego-Communist

Society must adopt a type of collectivism which operates from an individualist standpoint. In all instances, the individual should be deemed the most important component of a collectivist nation, and individualism not sacrificed in favor of society. Society must serve the interests of the individual, not the other way around. Collectivism should therefore be structured to appeal to the individual, making it appear more lucrative and a necessity to participate and cooperate collectively, than not. Collectivist practices should provide the individual with resources the individual could not otherwise acquire themselves, or else, the benefits of collectivist practices seldom outweigh the risks. Collectivist practices are essential to the advancement of humanity. Evolutionary speaking, individuals morally evolved towards the proclivity of cooperation. It was in an individuals best interest to learn to behave and cooperate with others for mutual survival and other benefits. How we made the jump from continuous moral and humanitarian evolvement, to the advancement of technology rendering everyone a retard is beyond me. Segregation of individuals based on their preferred moral principle. Ethic Autonomy, community, divinity. Until those who prefer communal or divine morality are able to acknowledge the rights of the individual practicing ethical autonomy, interaction between subgroups should be kept to a minimum, perhaps limited to a work setting unless persons choose otherwise.

Globalism is inevitable, in fact it already in practice. Closed borders only stop the slaves(you) they’re meant to keep in, they’re of no consequence to the rich, they’re of no consequence to corporations. Both are unaffected and freely conducting business internationally. They’re free to go as they please as they can afford the huge costs individual nations implement, effectively deterring travel between nations for the lower classes. We are spoon fed the idea that we need closed borders under the guise of protecting our ever scarce resources from other people, we don’t. There is plenty available resources to sustain the human population on earth. The only thing insisting on maintaining borders does, is halt advancement towards globalism for the average joe. Globalism, as I’ve mentioned already, was practiced by everyone who is rich and powerful. Individuals labor should afford them the same access to global freedom as those who exploit their labor. Globally, workers would have a better bargaining stance for the increase in wages, and working conditions. Borders serve to facilitate the exploitation of the working class in developing countries. Developing nations offer a source of cheap labor, and out of desperation the individual has no other option than working for whatever is available. Opening borders globally would mean the easy source of revenue would disappear, they’d have to pay everyone the same wage for the same labor. However, individuals in the 1st world countries wouldn’t be able to turn a blind eye to third world exploitation while simultaneously pretending their nation is more civilized, advanced, rich, moral, just all around more better than the 3rd world countries, and I highly doubt they’re ready to give up the small reduction in the cost of goods they get from that endeavor, even though the corporations are the ones that profit most.